PUBLIC METHODOLOGY / V0.2

Confidence is earned.

MOEModels separates what a publisher’s metadata establishes, what a reviewed source says, what this project measured, what the engine calculated, and what remains uncertain. Five different things, never merged into one number.

Corrections update the record without erasing its history.

01

CLAIM CLASS

Hub-derived record

Computed mechanically from a publisher API response, with every field naming the response field it came from. Exactly as trustworthy as the publisher's own metadata, and never a measurement.

commit revision · per-dtype bytes · routed experts · declared licence
02

CLAIM CLASS

Sourced fact

A directly supported value from a model card, technical report, repository, artifact, or vendor specification, reviewed by a person.

parameter count · context · license · expert topology
03

CLAIM CLASS

Measured evidence

A result this project produced from an identifiable configuration, with raw artifacts retained and a repeatable methodology.

TTFT · throughput · VRAM peak · routing skew
04

CLAIM CLASS

Calculated estimate

A deterministic output whose inputs, formula, range, and conservative assumptions remain visible.

checkpoint lower bound · usable memory · topology rounding
05

CLAIM CLASS

Inference

A reasoned conclusion derived from incomplete evidence and explicitly separated from sourced or measured claims.

likely bottleneck · deployment risk · validation priority

FIT ENGINE / FIRST PRINCIPLES

The calculation begins with residency.

Fit Check uses exact tensor bytes from a pinned artifact manifest, applies a declared memory reserve, and rounds the result to whole-node topology. Runtime allocations, KV cache, activations, compatibility, throughput, latency, and cost remain unknown until measured.

01checkpoint_bytes = pinned_manifest_tensor_bytes
02usable_vram_per_gpu = advertised_vram × (1 − reserve_bps / 10,000)
03minimum_gpus = ceil(checkpoint_bytes / usable_vram_per_gpu)
04topology_gpus = ceil(minimum_gpus / gpus_per_node) × gpus_per_node

CORRECTIONS / GOVERNANCE

Visible uncertainty beats false precision.

01Version every consequential record

The model release, checkpoint, runtime, hardware, methodology, and retrieval date form a single claim context.

02Never silently merge incompatible runs

Quantization, templates, reasoning budgets, hardware, and harness versions can change the meaning of a score.

03Publish ranges before predictions

The first engine favors deterministic memory math and conservative envelopes over uncalibrated throughput claims.

04Keep sponsorship outside ranking

A vendor may support research. It cannot purchase a result, confidence class, or placement.

Inspect a fit decision